The LFA Elections Committee has qualified 19 candidates and put hold on five, requesting for further explanations to get ready for the March 22 elections in Grand Bassa County.The committee said the qualified candidates for positions in the LFA Executive Committee are Lemuel B. Sharman, Allain Krayee, Samuel Y. Karn, Ansu V. S. Dulleh, Adolphus G. Harmon, Matthew Smith and Samuel Ashley.Others are Rochell G. D. Woodson, Wilmot Smith, Yanqueh S. Borsay, Urias Glaybo, Mustapha Raji, D. Sheba Browne, Wallace G. Weiah, and Ciata A. Bishop.The committee said Madam Ciata A. Bishop will serve as the female representative to the Executive Committee while the other nine candidates will go through the voting process.Meanwhile the committee at its press conference yesterday placed a hold on the following candidates: Cyrus N. Wright, D. Maxwell S. Kemayah, and Korpo Beatrice Kpoto, for what it said, “Inconsistencies that need clarification.”Also placed on hold are candidates Adolph Lawrence and Alfred Sayon due to double nominations by the Gardnersville FC, and said the clubs and the candidates will meet the committee to sort things out at the conference in the period of eight days.Chairman Malcolm Joseph assured all applicants of free, fair and transparent elections.However, Aliou Bah was disqualified for what it termed as “constitution stigma to participate for this year elections.”Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Dear Editor,A bright star has been eclipsed. When a comrade falls in the struggle, whether it is as the result of natural causes or otherwise, it is an unwelcome moment, and one for deep reflection, particularly when that comrade has had a profound influence on shaping one’s individual politics and life.Sister Andaiye is such a person. In many ways, she had contributed significantly to shaping my politics and life. I am indebted to her for deepening my understanding of the application of theory and practice relative to the struggle for political and social liberation.Her emphasis on the need to pay special attention to gender and child rights created an indelible impression on me. My activism in ASCRIA in my youthful days had engendered in me “love” and appreciation for the historical African woman, and women in general. This activism had informed my world view on the important role women in Guyana, the Caribbean, Africa and the wider world played in humanising mankind.However, it was in my many formal and informal discussions and debates with Sister Andaiye, in and out of the party’s organs, that I achieved new levels of consciousness on the marginalisation of women in the economic, social and political processes. On the issue of child rights, her advocacy broke new ground in Guyana, and contributed to the WPA’s political world view on this issue.There have been many excellent tributes paid to Andaiye’s activism by her contemporaries; these have highlighted, and will continue to highlight, her multi-talented contributions to the nation, the Caribbean and beyond. Her life, work and struggle have deservedly been well chronicled; therefore, I will restrict my reflections to matters that will not readily be found in the public records.I recall that, about two years after the assassination of Walter Rodney, Andaiye forced a debate in the WPA executive on the issue of “whether the Party is stronger now than during the period of Walter’s activism”. For readers to appreciate the significance of this debate, I am forced to offer the context.The high point of the WPA and Walter Rodney’s struggles against the then Burnham dictatorial regime was located in a three-month period of intense daily protests, public meetings, and mass demonstrations mainly in Georgetown and the lower East Coast of Demerara, which almost toppled the regime. This period became known as the “Civil Rebellion”.During this period, the WPA started the process of transition to a political party, which was completed after the assassination of Walter Rodney. In the post-Rodney phase, the party was better organised structurally, had developed many groups across the country, and had organised many protests and, notably, two nationwide days of rest that saw the economic and social life in Guyana come to a standstill.It is against this background that discussions in the party on the way forward were taking place. It is in this context that Andaiye forced the debate in the executive on whether the party at that time was stronger than during Rodney’s activism.She was the leading advocate that the party, in spite of its significant organisational development, was not stronger; but was in fact weaker. I was strongly opposed to her position, and argued that the party was now stronger. Years later, when events demonstrated the correctness of Andaiye’s position, in the spirit of WPA’s political culture, I conceded both privately and publicly to her superior understanding of the party situation in the debate. Readers will, I hope, forgive this necessary digression.The Walter Rodney Commission of Inquiry occasioned the opening of the WPA archives. I pointed to the importance that the party leadership had, at the time, placed on relying on a public defence for its security, as against a military defence. I mentioned the important role played by Sister Andaiye and WPA women under the stewardship of Andaiye, who had responsibility for party propaganda, locally and internationally. It is our considered judgement that the efficient and effective manner in which this most important task was executed was responsible for the party not suffering more casualties.Sister Bonita Harris had, for many years, held at her residence an annual New Year social attended by her relatives, friends and WPA comrades. At one of those events, to my surprise, one of the guests was a daughter of President Burnham. I remember sometime later raising the issue with Andaiye, and what it meant in light of the accusations being made about who was responsible for the assassination of Walter Rodney. Andaiye pondered for a brief moment, and made a gesture that indicated neither agreement nor disapproval. I did not press the issue, from my knowledge of how WPA women operated whether in or outside of the party, that the decision to invite the daughter of Burnham to Bonita’s social was not by accident. It was an indication that the women were reaching across party lines. My judgement is this had the blessings, or at least the non-objection, of Andaiye.In the run-up to the Walter Rodney CoI, Andaiye and I began to discuss how to deal with the inquiry to ensure the outcome we all wanted. Later, Mr Chris Ram, after volunteering his service as counsel, joined the discussions. It was under Andaiye’s guidance that we worked out the strategy and tactics which led to a successful outcome at the inquiry.In concluding this tribute to our beloved sister, comrade and “Mother” of the WPA, Co-Founder of Red Thread, Founder of the Guyana Cancer Society etc. etc. etc., we collectively and individually mourn the irreplaceable loss of an iconic figure who led by example.To all of us in the WPA, Red Thread, and all the members of the other organisations whose lives she had touched and affected by her humanity, I want to say to you that Andaiye’s passing, difficult as it is to endure, is something which we must all accept as an inevitable moment; and we must use her examples as the cornerstone of our own efforts at improving the lives of people, particularly the most downtrodden in societies.ANDAIYE LIVES as long as we continue the struggle! Farewell, comrade.Tacuma Ogunseye
Lobbying of public officials by relatives is allowed under state and county law. David Sommers, a spokesman for Knabe, said Rew is an independent member of the commission, and does not take marching orders from the supervisor’s office. “He is our appointment to the commission, but our office does not tell him how to vote on the issues,” he said. “The only instruction we’ve ever given Wayne is the supervisor is interested in bringing a balance between protecting the environment and growth in L.A. County.” As for Helsley, Murdock said the commissioner disclosed he was a pilot and stated at a January hearing he is a “strong supporter of privately owned airports,” which undermined his ability to be impartial. “It’s kind of a pilot’s culture,” Murdock said. “They feel that any attempt to regulate them is just out of whack. I don’t think he should be deciding the issue as he is, as a strong supporter of publicly owned airports.” Helsley, an appointee of 3rd District county Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, said Friday he is not a pilot, but does support private aviation. Also, his personal beliefs should not prevent him from voting, whether the issue is affordable housing or transportation. “I certainly support the activity of private aviation, and I see it as a diminishing resource in the world of travel and recreation,” he said. “I think that I can make an impartial decision, in what the community needs are and those things that serve the public need.” Eugene Tong, (661) 257-5253 [email protected] 160Want local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set! AGUA DULCE – As the county Regional Planning Commission prepares this week for what could be its final vote on the expansion permit of rural Agua Dulce Air Park, opponents are pressing two commissioners to recuse themselves from the issue, citing bias. Commissioners Wayne Rew and Hal Helsley are under attack by attorney John Murdock, who alleged they are biased in favor of allowing the expansion in a five-page letter obtained by the Daily News. Murdock, who represents local resident and airport opponent Justine Turner, claimed Rew was “openly hostile and biased against air park opponents” during commission hearings. And as an appointee of 4th District Supervisor Don Knabe, he may be biased because Knabe’s son Matt Knabe is a lobbyist for the airport. “Based upon the clear connection between the lobbyist, the supervisor and the commissioner, there is an all-too-obvious appearance of bias, which calls for Mr. Rew to recuse himself from voting on the pending matter,” Murdock wrote. AD Quality Auto 360p 720p 1080p Top articles1/5READ MORECasino Insider: Here’s a look at San Manuel’s new high limit rooms, Asian restaurant Murdock also said Helsley’s stated support of private airports at a January hearing should preclude him from the voting on the issue. The five-member panel is slated to vote Wednesday on an modified expansion permit for the airport, though an appeal to the county Board of Supervisors is expected. Murdock also said Knabe should recuse himself from the issue should the board take it on. The airstrip’s owners have been defending an expansion permit before the commission after residents of this rural community between the Santa Clarita and Antelope valleys complained of noise, extended filming and aerobatics by pilots. The complaints led to several violation notices. Commissioners including Rew and Helsley in January voted 3-2 in favor of closing the hearing with the intention to approve a modified permit, which allows a total 59 hangars, a 116,000 square-foot tie-down area and a 20-room “airtel” with a restaurant. Commissioners Pat Modugno and Leslie Bellamy dissented. The airstrip sits on 110 acres and currently has about 28 hangars, an aircraft tie-down area and an office/lounge/cafe.